The Tour

Safety From Numbers

Are you getting fatigued from so much avalanche safety talk these days? It’s become a media obsession to discuss ad infinitum all the nuances of being safe when skiing in the backcountry. Which begs the question of how safe you really are if you’re having too many safety meetings. There’s a tendency to think that as long as you’re recognizing the need to be safe, you must inevitably be acting more safely.

 

Ironic isn’t it, the more attention we pay to safety, and safe techniques, procedures, and gadgets, the less safe we may actually be. This is a tricky line to walk here and I’m not saying that learning about the factors that cause avalanches, from the snowpack to the human trigger, isn’t beneficial, it is. But with all this knowledge available and all this discussion of the topic you’d think that our hopes of at least reducing the number of avalanche deaths would be visible, yet it’s not.

 

There’s plenty of evidence to suggest that the attention paid to avalanche education and preparedness is having an effect. Even though the number of fatalities steadily grows, it seems participation levels are growing much faster so the net effect is a reduction in fatalities from a percentage point of view. However, in recent conversations with a number of avalanche pros, the underlying concern is that something is wrong at the root. Perhaps it is merely our expectations, but the question of “what’s wrong” is worth pursuing on faith alone it will save some who might have perished otherwise.

 

To my mind, one of the ingredients missing is how to cultivate a proper respect for the danger avalanches pose and the only way I have ever seen is to instill fear, either through a real close call or a controlled simulation, like being buried with an avalung for at least five minutes, 15 if you dare, or doing a real dig for a full sized dummy two meters deep.

2015-01-14 16.20.52-1

Keep in mind I’m fully aware that even this does not guarantee avoidance as my own personal history can attest. I’ve done the things I’m recommending but it hasn’t prevented me from getting caught, and still remain, quite luckily, unscathed. Nonetheless I believe fear of getting caught is at the root of staying alive.

 

There are other ways to do this but the one I consider to be most easily implemented, and the one that is likely to have a lasting effect, is to tour solo. Yeah, I know, never ski alone, it’s unsafe. So is skiing with a group, and I’ll add that the evidence suggests it’s a lot less safe to ski with a group than it is to ski solo. Just consider how many avalanche fatalities occur in groups versus solo. Solo avalanche accidents are very rare.

 

The reason is simple; as soon as you are skiing with a group you have already started making compromises to self-preservation in deference to acceptance by the group. All the Human Factors that contribute to missing obvious clues start exerting their influence and pretty soon it’s a crapshoot whether it’s you or a friend who becomes the trigger and the victim.

 

I’ll go out on a limb here and state unequivocally that backcountry skiing solo is safer than skiing with a group. That claim stands in stark contrast to mantra that there’s safety in numbers so here’s my rationale behind it.

 

First of all, it goes without saying that, unless you are suicidal, when you ski solo your instincts for self-preservation will automatically kick in. When we’re with a group, we automatically allow ourselves to do things that we would only do if someone else were around, in the worst-case scenario, to render first aid should we need it. Secondly, of course, is for the audience factor. I don’t know too many people hucking big solo, but plenty do it for the camera and the accolades of friends.

 

Now don’t mistake my recommending solo touring as a regular pastime, although I’m guilty as charged. The purpose is to force yourself to understand what your baseline for safe travel is in the backcountry when you do not have a safety net of friends. What chances are you willing to take? What extra gear will you carry? What route will put you at the least risk of harm, from any number of potential hazards, including but not limited to avalanches? Unless you know what this is, how will you know how far being with a group causes you to increase the risk you’re willing to take? And if you’re simply too fearful to ski solo, what does that say about your confidence in yourself when skiing wild snow, or maybe more importantly, your willingness to put your fate in the another mans hands?

hg_0402_0088

Two years ago there were three avalanche fatalities in the Tahoe area on two different days. On both days I was out touring solo. When I relayed this to friends they immediately accused me of being reckless. I was fully aware the avalanche potential was at least considerable, if not high. I went for a tour anyway ‘cuz I needed a workout and there just isn’t a better way. On one tour, I had in mind to ski a fairly steep pitch, but only if the snow felt stable. My meandering path took me to a mini-cornice where I could test the stability. It broke easier than expected, but didn’t trigger anything below. In theory I could probably get away with skiing the slope I wanted, but being solo, figured I better not take the chance. There would be no one to pull me out and if it ripped, I’d die from exposure if not asphyxiation. So I chose a ridgeline, not the steep line for my descent and, other than soaking in the beauty of the mountains cloaked in snow and leaving a serpentine furrow in my wake, had an uneventful tour.

 

It might be that the first few times you head out solo you are excessively cautious. Take note. More likely you will find that you are paying much closer attention to the conditions around you, after all, there’s no one else on the skin track to distract you with conversations about things that are far from the task at hand.

 

That’s when you might notice another benefit of the solo tour. With no audience to show off in front of, the turn ceases to be the reason you’re out there. You notice the frosted pine needles, backlit by the sun, the texture of the snow, how it compresses beneath your skis as you skin your way up, and the view from the top.

 

It quickly becomes clear it’s about the tour, not the turn, and that, my friends, is the best way I know to avoid getting hurt. Let the turn be your reward, but not your motivation.

 

Previous post

The Beer Factor

Next post

New Zealand- Backcountry Summer Paradise

Craig Dostie

Craig Dostie

Your plans for this winter?
Ski a lot then take a break in the middle of the season to go kiteboarding where warm waves are whipped in to shape by the wind and return for a kite powered spring touring season.

1 Comment

  1. Andrew
    July 20, 2015 at 2:26 pm — Reply

    I often tour solo, and I feel the same way about it. I am more cautious, and I am more often mindful of my surroundings. When you tour solo you pick the path and manage all the risk. I have zero issue turning around solo if the conditions are not great or appear unsafe.

    I have found, touring solo, that I make better time and cover way more ground when i’m solo. I dont know why, I go with people more athletic than me, but for some reason, I make better time and get in more vertical when solo. I feel safer as long as I am alone in the mountains.

    It is scary, though when you are solo and there are others in the mountains that can bring down an avalanche on top of you (or their dog does).

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *